Status ubi inuenitur? (Fort., Rhet. I 28)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.1984.v52.i1.711Abstract
The different point of view on status, that Fortunatian (Rhet. I 28) attributed to Theodorus of Gadara and Hermagoras of Temnos, can be explained, basing on a survey of the treatment of the example cited in the passage (the famous causa Milonis) by all late Latin rhetoricians and Quintilian: according to Theodorus the status (caput or κεφάλαιον in his jargon) can be found in iudicatio (κρινόμενον), to Hermagoras in quaestio (ζήτημα). So it is possible that Iulius Victor in Rhet. p. 4, 26 ff. G. C., should have quoted the Theodorean doctrine on αἲτιον-συνέχον whose meanings result overturned in comparison with the Hermagorean opinion. Finally with good probability Theodorus was the first who treated of status principales and incidentes (capila generalia and specialia in his jargon) within the limits of a civil or criminal cause.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1984 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.