La lengua de Hécuba como suplicante en la tragedia homónima

Sandra  Rodríguez-Piedrabuena

doi:10.3989/emerita.2022.02.2122

Autores/as

Sandra Rodríguez-Piedrabuena Universidad Autónoma de Madrid https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4675-6471

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2022.02.2122

Palabras clave:

Teoría de la cortesía, súplica, caracterización lingüística, Eurípides

Resumen

Comparamos las dos súplicas de Hécuba junto con otras súplicas aceptadas y rechazadas desde la perspectiva de la teoría de la cortesía. Esta comparación nos permitirá trazar la evolución de su manera de expresarse a lo largo de la trama. Las diferencias entre su primera y segunda súplica en cuanto a la estrategia comunicativa a la que recurre el personaje pueden contribuir a su caracterización.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Allan, W. (2001): Euripides. The Children of Heracles, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1228hfq

Avezzù, G. (2019): «Hecuba's Rhetoric», in Markantonatos, A. and Volonaki, E. (eds.), Poet and Orator: A Symbiotic Relationship in Democratic Athens, Berlin- Boston, pp. 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110629729-001

Battezzato, L. (2008): Linguistica e retorica della tragedia greca, Rome.

Battezzato, L. (2010): Euripide: Ecuba, Milan.

Battezzato, L. (2018): Euripides: Hecuba, Cambridge.

Berger, Ł. (2017): «The Old Man and Linguistic Politeness in the Comedies of Plautus», Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae 27 (3), pp. 249-273. https://doi.org/10.14746/sppgl.2017.XXVII.3.14

Bond, G. W. (1981): Euripides. Heracles, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198140603.book.1

Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987): Politeness. Some Universals in Language Use, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085

CGCG = Emde Boas, E. van, Rijksbaron, A., et al., (2019): The Cambridge Grammar of Classical Greek, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139027052

Coleridge, E. P. (1938): Euripides. The Complete Greek Drama, edited by Whitney J. Oates and Eugene O'Neill, Jr. in two volumes, New York.

Collard, C. (1991): Euripides. Hecuba, Warminster. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110967722

Comrie, B. (1976): «Linguistic Politeness Axes. Speaker-addressee, Speaker-referent, Speaker-bystander», Pragmatics Microfiche 1 (7), pp. 1-12.

Conacher, D. (1961): «Euripides' Hecuba», American Journal of Philology 82 (1), pp. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.2307/292004

Culpeper, J. (2011): Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752

Dickey, E. (2010): «Forms of Address and Markers of Status», in Bakker, E. J. (ed.), A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, Chichester-Malden (MA), pp. 327-337. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444317398.ch22

Diggle, J. (1994): Euripidea, Oxford.

Dik, H. (2003): «On Unemphatic 'Emphatic' Pronouns in Greek», Mnemosyne 56 (5), pp. 535-550. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852503770735943

Emde Boas, E. van (2017): Language and Character in Euripides' Electra, Oxford. Gregory, J. (1999): Euripides. Hecuba, Oxford.

Haverkate, H. (1984): Speech Acts, Speakers and Hearers. Reference and Referential Strategies in Spanish, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.v.4

Haverkate, H. (1992): «Deictic Categories as Mitigating Devices», Pragmatics 2 (4), pp. 505-522. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.2.4.03hav

Hickie, W. J. (1853): The Comedies of Aristophanes, vol. I, London.

House, J. & Kasper, G. (1981): «Politeness Markers in English and German», in Coulmas F., (ed.), Conversational Routine. Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, The Hague-Paris-New York, pp. 157-185.

Jebb, R. C. (1883-1896): Sophocles. The Plays and the Fragments, Cambridge.

Kaimio, M. (1988): Physical Contact in Greek Tragedy. A Study of Stage Conventions, Helsinki.

Katsouris, A. (1975): Linguistic and Stylistic Characterization. Tragedy and Menander, Ioannina.

Kopperschmidt, J. (1966): Die Hikesie als dramatische Form, Doctoral dissertation, Tübingen.

Kovacs, D. (1995): Euripides. Children of Heracles. Hippolytus. Andromache. Hecuba. Edited and translated by David Kovacs, Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.euripides-children_heracles.1995

Leech, G. (1983): Principles of Pragmatics, London-New York.

Leech, G. (2014): The Pragmatics of Politeness, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001

Martin, G. (2018): «A Dialogic Soliloquy? On Polyxena's Conversational Behaviour in E. Hec. 415-422», Mnemosyne 72 (1), pp. 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525X-12342510

Mastronarde, D. J. (1988): Review [Diggle, J. 1984. Euripidis Fabulae, Tomus I], Classical Philology 83 (2), pp. 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1086/367096

Mastronarde, D. J. (2010): The Art of Euripides: Dramatic Technique and Social Context, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676437 PMCid:PMC2922647

Matthiessen, K. (2010): Euripides: Hekabe, Berlin-New York. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110229462

Mercier, C. (1990): Suppliant Ritual in Euripidean Tragedy, Doctoral Dissertation, Columbia University, New York.

Mossman, J. (1995): Wild Justice. A Study of Euripides' Hecuba, Oxford.

Naiden, F. (2006): Ancient Supplication, Oxford-New York. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183412.001.0001

PAGD = Bonifazi, A., Drummen, A. & de Kreij, M. (2016): Particles in Ancient Greek Discourse: Exploring Particle Use across Genres, Washington, DC.

Pohlenz, M. (1954). Die griechische Tragödie, 2d ed., Göttingen.

Pulleyn, S. (1997): Prayer in Greek Religion, Oxford.

Reckford, K. J. (1985): «Concepts of Demoralization in the Hecuba», en Burian, P. (ed.), Directions in Euripidean Criticism, Durham, pp. 112-128.

Rodríguez-Piedrabuena, S. (2020a): «Hipercortesía verbal en Eurípides», Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae 30 (1), pp. 75-95. https://doi.org/10.14746/sppgl.2020.XXX.4

Rodríguez-Piedrabuena, S. (2020b): «(Im-)politeness Strategies in Euripides. An Approach to Linguistic Characterisation through Qualitative Data Analysis», Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 139, pp. 271-298.

Rodríguez-Piedrabuena, S. (2022a): «Ejes de cortesía lingü.stica en Eurípides», Veleia 39, pp. 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1387/veleia.22353

Rodríguez-Piedrabuena, S. (2022b): Caracterización y cortesía en Eurípides, Zaragoza.

Rutherford, R. (2012): Greek Tragic Style. Form, Language and Interpretation, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511842771

Schadewaldt, W. (1926): Monolog und Selbstgespräch. Untersuchungen zur Formengeschichte der griechischen Tragödie, Berlin.

Schmitt, J. (1921): Freiwilliger Opfertod bei Euripides, Giessen. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111373621 PMid:18738567 PMCid:PMC1517034

Sidnell, J. (2010): Conversation Analysis. An Introduction, Chichester. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0062

Stevens, P. T. (1971): Euripides, Andromache. Edited with Introduction and Commentary, Oxford.

Temmerman, K. de (2014): Crafting Characters. Heroes and Heroines in the Ancient Greek Novel, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199686148.001.0001

Unceta Gómez, L. (2017): «Estrategias de cortesía lingü.stica en Querolus», Latomus 76, pp. 140-161.

Vito, A. de (1988): Characterization in Greek Tragedy, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto.

Watts, R. J. (2003): Politeness, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184

Watts, R. J. (2005 [1992]): «Linguistic Politeness Research: Quo vadis?», in Watts, R. J., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlin-New York, pp. xi-xlvii. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199819

Wilkins, J. (1990): «The State and the Individual: Euripides' Plays of Voluntary Self- Sacrifice», in Powell, A. (ed.), Euripides, Women, and Sexuality, London-New York, pp. 177-194. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203402351_chapter_7

Worman, N. (2002): The Cast of Character: Style in Greek literature, Austin. https://doi.org/10.7560/791558 PMCid:PMC262350