Zeus and Trojan advantage: traces of elaborations of the tradition in the Iliad
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2015Keywords:
Neoanalysis, Zeus’ plan, CypriaAbstract
Following a theoretical model, this article assumes that the poet of the Iliad is aware of the potential inconsistency between the traditional account of the wrath and the version which he elaborates, and shows how the poem manages both according to its expressive and structural purposes.
Downloads
References
Allan, B. 2008: «Performing the Will of Zeus», in Revermann, M. y Wilson, P. (eds.), Performance, Iconography, Reception, Oxford, pp. 204-216.
Barker, E. T. E. 2008: «Momos Advises Zeus: Changing Representations of Cypria fr. 1», in Cingano, E. y Milano, L. (eds.), Papers on ancient literatures: Greece, Rome and the near east, Padova, pp. 33-73.
Bernabé, A. 19962: Poetarum epicorum Graecorum. Testimonia et fragmenta – Pars I, Stuttgart-Leipzig.
Burgess, J. S. 1996: «The Non-Homeric Cypria», TAPhA 126, pp. 77-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/370172
Burgess, J. S. 2001: The Tradition of the Trojan War in Homer and the Epic Cycle, Baltimore-London.
Burgess, J. S. 2006: «Neoanalysis, Orality, and Intertextuality», OT 21/1, pp. 148-189.
Cerri, G. 2002: «Teoria dell'oralità e analisi stratigrafica del testo omerico», QUCC, 70/1, pp. 7-34.
Chantraine, P. 1958: Grammaire homérique, II: Syntaxe, Paris.
Clay, J. S. 1991: «The Whip and the Will of Zeus», Literary Imagination 1, pp. 40-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/litimag/1.1.40
Coray, M. 2009: Homers Ilias. Gesamtkommentar, VI/2, Mu.nchen-Leipzig.
Cordano, F. 1998: «Achille desiste dall'ira», in Sordi, M. (ed.), Responsabilità, perdono e vendetta nel mondo antico, Milano, pp. 3-8.
Davies, M. 1988: Epicorum Graecorum fragmenta, Göttingen.
Davies, M. 1989: «The Date of the Epic Cycle», Glotta 67, pp. 89-100.
Davies, M. 20012: The Greek Epic Cycle, Bristol.
Del Grande, C. 1975: Storia della letteratura greca I, Milano.
De Jong, I. 20042: Narrators and Focalizers. The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad, London.
Di Benedetto, V. 1998: Nel laboratorio di Omero, Torino. PMCid:PMC325577
Dodds, E. R. 1951: The Greeks and the Irrational, Berkeley.
Edwards, M. W. 1991: The Iliad: a Commentary. Vol. V: Books 17-20, Cambridge.
Edwards, M. W. 2004: Recensione di Burgess 2001, Phoenix 58/1, pp. 144-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4135202
Erbse, H. 1986: Untersuchungen zur Funktion der Götter im homerischen Epos, Berlin.
Fowler, R. 2004: «The Homeric Question», in Fowler, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer, Cambridge, pp. 220-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521813026.014
Griffin, J. 1995: Homer. Iliad IX, edited with introduction and commentary, Oxford.
Hainsworth, B. 1993: The Iliad: a Commentary. Vol. III: Books 9-12, Cambridge.
Hirschberger, M. 2012: «The Fate of Achilles in the Iliad», in Montanari, Rengakos, Tsagalis 2012, pp. 185-196.
Holmberg, I. 1998: «The Creation of the Ancient Epic Cycle», OT 13, pp. 456-478.
Huxley, G. L. 1969: Greek Epic Poetry: From Eumelos to Panyassis, Cambridge, Ma.
Janko, R. 1994: The Iliad: a Commentary. Vol. IV: Books 13-16, Cambridge.
Jouan, F. 1966: Euripide et les légendes des Chants Cypriens, Paris.
Kirk, G. S. 1985: The Iliad: a Commentary. Vol. I: Books 1-4, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620263.003
Kirk, G. S. 1990: The Iliad: a Commentary. Vol. II: Books 5-8, Cambridge.
Kullmann, W. 1955: «Ein vorhomerisches Motiv im Iliasproömium», Philologus 99, pp. 167-192.
Kullmann, W. 1956: «Zur Δι. βουλ. des Iliasproömiums», Philologus 100, pp. 132-133.
Kullmann, W. 1960: Die Quellen der Ilias, Wiesbaden.
Kullmann, W. 1984: «Oral Poetry Theory and Neoanalysis in Homeric Research», GRBS 25, pp. 307-324.
Kullmann, W. 2012: «Neoanalysis between Orality and Literacy», in Montanari, Rengakos, Tsagalis 2012, pp. 13-25.
Lesky, A. 2001: «Divine and Human Causation in Homeric Epic», in Cairns, D. L. 2001 (ed.), Oxford Readings in Homer's Iliad, Oxford, pp. 170-202.
Lowenstam, S. 1997: «Talking Vases», TAPhA 127, pp. 21-76.
Marcovich, M. 1969: «Bedeutung der Motive des Volksglaubens fu.r die Textinterpretation», QUCC 8, pp. 28-36.
Marks, J. 2002: «The Junction between the Kypria and the Iliad», Phoenix 56/1-2, pp. 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1192467
Montanari, F., 2012: «Introduction» in Montanari, Rengakos, Tsagalis 2001, pp. 1-10.
Montanari, F., Rengakos A., Tsagalis, Ch. (eds.) 2012: Homeric Contexts, Berlin-Boston. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110272017
Myers, T. 2013: «Reflection: Representations of Efficient Causation in the Iliad», in Schmaltz, T. (ed.) Efficient Causation, Oxford, pp. 48-53. PMid:23178699
Nagy, G. 2010: «Aristarchus and the Epic Cycle», Classics@ 6.
Notopoulos, J. 1964: «Studies in Early Greek Oral Poetry», HSCP 68, pp. 1-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/310798
Parlato, G. 2007: «I "modernismi" linguistici dei Cypria», RIFC 135/1, pp. 5-36.
Rabel, R. J. 1997: Plot and Point of View in the Iliad, Ann Arbor. PMid:9061678
Race, W. 2002: «Explanatory δ.-Clauses in the Iliad», CJ 95, pp. 205-229.
Redfield, J. 1979: «The Proem of the Iliad: Homer's Art», CPh 74/2, pp. 95-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/366485
Sbardella, L. 2012: Cucitori di canti, Roma.
Scafoglio, G. 2004: «Proclo e il ciclo epico», GFA 7, pp. 39-57.
Schmitt, R. 1990: «Zur Sprache der kyklischen Kypria», in Gorier W. y Koster S. (eds.) Pratum Saraviense, Stuttgard, pp. 11-24. PMid:2082483
Severyns, A. 1928: Le cycle épique dans l'école d'Artistarque, Liège-Paris.
Severyns, A. 1953: Recherches sur la Chrestomatie de Procle, vol. III, Paris.
Slatkin, L. M. 1991: The Power of Thetis, Berkeley-Los Angeles-Oxford.
West, M. L. 1995: «The date of the Iliad», MH 52, pp. 204-219.
West, M. L. 2003: Greek epic fragments, Cambridge, Ma.-London.
West, M. L. 2011: The Making of the Iliad, Oxford-New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199590070.001.0001
West, M. L. 2013: The Epic Cycle, Oxford-New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662258.001.0001
Wilamowitz, U. 19202: Die Ilias und Homer, Berlin.
Wyatt, W. 1982: «Homeric .τη», AJPh 103, pp. 247-276.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
