Myth and history in the mythography of the imperial age: Lycus πολέμαρχος (Apollod., Bibl. III 41)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2019.13.1915Keywords:
Mythography, polemarchy, Thebes, Lycus, genealogies, Pseudo-ApollodorusAbstract
The way Lycus conquers power over Thebes in Pseudo-Apollodorus’ Library is marked by some elements that seem to refer to political institutions. His election as a polemarch may allude to events that took place in Boeotia in the fourth century B.C. This allusion represents a clear anachronism against the background of the mythographer’s tales. The anachronism is related to the narrative development of the section to which it belongs: the reference to polemarchy, by stressing the difference between the legitimate sovereignty of the Cadmeians and the illegitimate sovereignty of Lycus, Zethus and Amphion, contributes to the compositional plan conceived by ps. Apollodorus, which consists of genealogical continuity. Therefore, the anachronism can be considered as the result of a choice of the author and reveals that the mythographers played also a role in the iteration between mythical time and historical past that we can find in their works.
Downloads
References
Acerbo, S. 2019: Le tradizioni mitiche nella Biblioteca dello ps. Apollodoro. Percorsi nella mitografia di età imperiale, Amsterdam.
Bearzot, C. 2003: «Il concetto di dynasteia e lo stato ellenistico», in Bearzot, C., Landucci, F. e Zecchini G. (eds.), Gli stati territoriali nel mondo antico, Milano, pp. 1-24.
Berman, D. W. 2004: «The Double Foundation of Boiotian Thebes», TAPA 134, pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1353/apa.2004.0002
Bertolini, F. 1996: «La Guerra di Troia: una vicenda esemplare» in Settis, S. (ed.), I Greci: storia, cultura, arte, società, 2 Una storia greca, 1 Formazione, Torino, pp. 1211-1230.
Brillante, C. 1979-80: «Apollod. Bibl. III 5,5», RCCM 21-22, pp. 195-198.
Buck, R. J. 1979: A History of Boeotia, Alberta.
Buckler, J. e Beck, H. 2008: Central Greece and the Politics of Power in the fourth Century B. C., Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482717
Collard, Ch. e Cropp, M. 2008: Euripides, Volume VII, Fragments, Aegeus-Meleager, Harvard.
Delattre, C. 2013: «Pentaméron mythographique. Les grecs ont-ils écrit leurs mythes?», Lalies 33, pp. 77-170.
Delattre, C. 2018: «Périégèse et exégèse: l'exemple de Pausanias», in Delattre, C. e Valette, E. (eds.), Pragmatique du commentaire: mondes anciens, mondes lointains, Turnhout, pp. 313-344.
Dowden, K. 1992: The Uses of Greek Mythology, Londra-New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203316269
Fletcher, K. F. B. 2013: «Hyginus' Fabulae: Toward a Roman Mythography», in Trzaskoma, S. M. e Smith, R. S. (eds.), Writing Myth. Mythography in the Ancient World, Lovanio-Parigi-Walpole (MA), pp. 133-164.
Fowler, R. L. 2013: Early Greek Mythography. Volume 2: Commentary, Oxford.
Fowler, R. L. 2017: «Apollodorus and the Art of the Variant», in Pàmias, J. (ed.), Apollodoriana. Ancient Myths, New Crossroads, Berlino-Boston, pp. 158-175. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110545326-011
Gantz, T. 1993: Early Greek Myth: a Guide to Literary and Artistic Sources, Baltimora.
Gasti, F. 2017: Igino. Miti del mondo classico, Sant'Arcangelo di Romagna.
Godhill, S. 2009: «The Anecdote: Exploring the Boundaries between Oral and Literate Performance in the Second Sophistic», in Johnson, W. A. e Parker, H. N. (eds.), Ancient Literacies. The Culture of
Readings in Greece and Rome, Oxford.
Harris, E. M. 2006: «Antigone the Lawyer, or the Ambiguities of Nomos», in Harris, E. M. e Rubinstein, L. (eds.), The Law and the Courts in Ancient Greece, Londra, pp. 19-56.
Jouan, F. e Van Looy, H. 1998: Euripide. Tome VIII. Fragments 1re partie. Aigeus-Autolykos, Parigi.
Jourdain-Annequin, C. 1985: «Héraclès, latris et doulos. Sur quelques aspects du travail dans le mythe héroïque», DHA 11, pp. 486-538. https://doi.org/10.3406/dha.1985.1673
Kuch, H. 2011: «Positionen in der Antiope des Euripides», AAntHung, 51, pp. 408-411. https://doi.org/10.1556/AAnt.51.2011.3-4.1
Morgan, C. 2009: «The Early Iron Age», in Raaflaub, K. A. e van Wees, H. (eds.), A Companion to Archaic Greece, Maiden-Oxford, pp. 43-63.
Papathomopulos, M. 2010: ???????Ω??? ??????????. Apollodori Bibliotheca post Richardum Wagnerum recognita, Atene.
Raaflaub, K.A. 1997: «Homeric Society», in Morris, I. e Powell, B. B. (eds.), A New Companion to Homer, Leida, pp. 624-648.
Roesch, P. 1965: Thespies et la Confédération Béotienne, Parigi.
Scarpi, P. e Ciani, M. G. 1996: Apollodoro, I Miti Greci (Biblioteca), Milano.
Schachter, A. 2016: «Toward a Revised Chronology of the Theban Magistrates' Coins», in Gartland, S. D. (ed.), Boiotia in the fourth Century B.C., Philadelphia, pp. 43-58. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812293760-005
Schaefer, H. 1956: «Polemarchos», RE suppl. 8, coll. 1108-1117, Stoccarda.
Small, J. P. 1997: Wax Tablets of the Mind. Cognitive Studies of the Memory and Literacy in Classical Antiquity, Londra-New York.
Talamo, C. 1979: La Lidia arcaica: Tradizioni genealogiche ed evoluzione istituzionale, Bologna.
Trzaskoma, S. M. 2013: «Citation, Organization and Authorial Presence in Ps. Apollodorus' Bibliotheca», in Trzaskoma, S. M. e Smith, R. S. (eds.), Writing Myth: Mythography in the Ancient World, Lovanio-Parigi-Walpole, pp. 75-94.
Ulf, C. 2009: «The World of Homer and Hesiod», in Raaflaub, K. A. e van Wees, H. (eds.), A Companion to Archaic Greece, Maiden-Oxford, pp. 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444308761.ch5
Wagner, R. 1926: Apollodori Bibliotheca. Apollodori Bibliothecae Epitoma ex epitoma Vaticana et fragmentis Sabbaiticis composita. Pediasimi libellus de duodecim Herculis laboribus, Lipsia.
West, M. L. 1985: The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women. Its Nature, Structure, and Origins, Oxford.
Wohl, V. 2014: «Comedy and Athenian law», in Revermann, M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Comedy, Cambridge, pp. 322-335. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139015356.022
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
