Naming as a Human Linguistic Act in Parmenides

Authors

  • Nazyheli Aguirre de la Luz Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2021.08.2023

Keywords:

Parmenides, Presocratic philosophy, language and knowledge, philosophy of language

Abstract


As the work of several scholars has shown in the last decades, there is in Parmenides, with respect to his predecessors, an enhanced awareness of the threefold connection between reality, thinking and language. Starting from the researches devoted to names and naming (ὀνόματα, ὀνομάζω) in Parmenides by Woodbury (1958 & 1986), this study sets out to examine anew on a broader basis the four explicit references to the naming procedure (Parm. 28 B 8.38-41; B 8.53-56; B 9.1 ff.; B 19.3 DK), which are viewed from a semiotic standpoint so as to bring out the role played by language in the epistemological approach of the Eleatic thinker. In particular, it is shown how Parmenides’ criticism directed at the δόξαι βροτῶν need not be linked to his conventionalist outlook on language, but rather to the identification of a failure in the cognitive process leading to a classification of the real by mortal men.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguirre De la Luz, N. (2020): «El verbo εἰμί en Parménides: entre epistemología y ontología», Hypnos 44(1), pp. 54-74.

Bernabé Pajares, A. (2007): Parménides: Poema. Fragmentos y tradición textual, Madrid.

Bernabé Pajares, A. (2008): Fragmentos presocráticos. De Tales a Demócrito, Madrid.

Bernabé, A. (2019): «Parménides: entre lingüística, literatura y filosofía», en Berruecos, B. y Giombini, S. (eds.), Parmenide: tra linguistica letteratura e filosofia / Parménides: entre lingüística, literatura y filosofía, Sankt Augustin, pp. 47-118. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783896658081-47

Cherubin, R. (2001): «Λέγειν, Νοεῖν, and Τὸ Ἐόν in Parmenides», Ancient Philosophy 21, pp. 277-301. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil200121245

Cherubin, R. (2005): «Light, Night, and the Opinions of Mortals: Parmenides B8.51-61 and B9», Ancient Philosophy 25, pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil20052516

Cordero, N. L. (2005): Siendo, se es. La tesis de Parménides, Buenos Aires.

Cornford, F. M. (1935): Plato's Theory of Knowledge, Londres.

Coxon, A. H. (2009): The Fragments of Parmenides, vol. 1, Las Vegas-Zúrich-Atenas.

Deichgräber, K. (1958): «Parmenides' Auffahrt zur Göttin des Rechts: Untersuchungen zum Prooimion seines Lehrgedichts», Abhandlungen der Akademie Mainz.

Geistes-und Sozialwissenschaftliche Klasse 11, pp. 629-724.

Diels, H. (1882): Simplicii in Aristotelis Physicorum libros quattuor priores commentaria, Berlín.

Diels, H. (1897): Parmenides Lehrgedicht, Berlín. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111546100

Diels, H. y Kranz, W. (1960): Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 6a ed., Berlín.

Falus, R. (1960): «Parmenides-Interpretationen», Acta Antiqua Academiae Hungaricae 8, pp. 276-794.

Furley, D. J. (1973): «Notes on Parmenides», en A. P. D. Mourelatos & R. M. Rorty (eds.) Exegesis and Argument: Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregory Vlastos (Phronesis suppl. 1), pp. 1-15.

Havelock, E. A. (1983): «The Linguistic Task of the Presocratics», en K. Robb (ed.), Language and Thought in Early Greek Philosophy, La Salle, pp. 7-82.

Jantzen, J. (1976): Parmenides zum Verhältnis von Sprache und Wirklichkeit, Múnich.

Kahn, C. H. (2009): Essays on Being, Nueva York.

Loenen, J. H. M. M. (1959): Parmenides, Melissus, Gorgias, Assen.

Mason, R. (1988): «Parmenides and Language», Ancient Philosophy 8, pp. 149-166. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil1988821

McKirahan, R. D. (2008): «Signs and Arguments in Parmenides B8», en Curd, P. y Graham, D. W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, Oxford, pp. 189-229. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195146875.003.0007

Mourelatos, A. P. D. (2008): The Route of Parmenides, 2a ed., Las Vegas-Zúrich-Atenas.

Owens, J. (1975): «Naming in Parmenides», en Mansfeld, J. y Rijk, L. M. (eds.), Kephalaion: Studies in Greek Philosophy and its continuation, Assen, pp. 16-25.

Palmer, J. (2009): Parmenides & Presocratic Philosophy, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567904.001.0001

Pulpito, M. (2019): «El 'giro lingüístico' de Parménides», en Berruecos, B. & Giombini, S. (eds.), Parmenide: tra linguistica letteratura e filosofia / Parménides: entre lingüística, literatura y filosofía, Sankt Augustin, pp.189-201. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783896658081-189

Robb, K. (1983): «Preliterate Ages and the Linguistic Art of Heraclitus», en Robb, K. (ed.), Language and Thought in Early Greek Philosophy, La Salle, pp. 152-206.

Tarán, L. (1965): Parmenides: A Text with Translation, Commentary, and Critical Essays, Princeton.

Vlastos, G. (2008): «'Names' of Being in Parmenides», en Mourelatos, A. P. D. (ed.), The Route of Parmenides, 2a ed., Las Vegas-Zúrich-Atenas, pp. 367-389.

Woodbury, L. (1958): «Parmenides on Names», Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 63, pp. 145-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/310851

Woodbury, L. (1986): «Parmenides on Naming by Mortal Men: Fr. B8.53-56», Ancient Philosophy 6, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil198661

Downloads

Published

2021-12-02

How to Cite

Aguirre de la Luz, N. (2021). Naming as a Human Linguistic Act in Parmenides. Emerita, 89(2), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2021.08.2023

Issue

Section

Articles