El etrusco como indoeuropeo anatolio: viejos y nuevos argumentos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2005.v73.i1.52Keywords:
flexion, nominal, adjectival, verbal, archaic indoeuropean, archaic anatolian, pre-brugmannianAbstract
The author exposes again his theory, which considers Etruscan as a derivative of the most ancient Indoeuropean, preserved in some Anatolian languages. He studies this problem from a linguistic point of view: sg. = Pl., N. = Ac., N. = G., nominal, adjectival and verbal (monothematic) flexion of an archaic IE type, comparing Etruscan with the pre-brugmannian, archaic Indoeuropean. He maintains his opinion that the Etruscans arived in Italy in the VII century b. C. or before, bringing an archaic Indoeuropean language from Asia Minor. Naturally, it adquired secundarily some Italic elements. — He criticizes the opinions of several linguists and as well some theories of nationalistic nature which should be withdrawn now. Archaeologists have silenced linguistic problems which are important, but alien to them.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2005 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
