Ille quidem totam gemebundus obambulat Aetnen: Parodic allusions to Ovidian Cyclops in Petronius, Sat. 100.3-5

Authors

  • Marcos Carmignani CIECS-CONICET. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2012.18.1118

Keywords:

Satyricon, Metamorphoses, Odissey, intertextuality, pathetic tone, parody, tremebundus-gemebundus

Abstract


This paper analyzes the function of the allusions to the lamentation of the Ovidian Cyclops in the words of Tryphena and in Encolpius’ reaction (Sat. 100.3-5). These allusions parody the attitude of the Homeric Cyclops and the topic of the adventure by the sea, which is a recurrent theme in the Greek idealistic novel. Although the Homeric episode is the most renowned model of any allusion to the Cyclops, Petronius «enriches» the text with other connotations that mediate and complicate the relationship between the Satyricon and Homer: these connotations are the allusions to Ovid that, by means of a change in tone, allow the parody to take place. This change of tone is realized by the use of tremebundus, which alludes to Ovid, Met. XIV 188 (gemebundus). The allusion implies a form of degradation, which is the intertextual mark that Petronius leaves to make us understand that Encolpius’ reaction absolutely lacks decorum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bömer, F. 1986: P. Ovidius Naso. Metamorphosen Buch XIV-XV, Heidelberg.

Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1978: Ciris. A Poem Attributed to Vergil, Cambridge.

Müller, K. (ed.) 19954: Petronius Satyricon Reliquiae, Stuttgart.

Vannini, G. 2010: Petronii Arbitri «Satyricon» 100-115. Edizione critica e commento, Berlín-Nueva York.

Baldo, G. 1995: Dall’Eneide alle Metamorfosi. Il codice epico di Ovidio, Padua.

Baldwin, B. 1973: «Ira Priapi», CPh 68, pp. 294-296.

Barchiesi, A. 1984: «Il nome di Lica e la poetica dei nomi in Petronio», MD 12, pp. 169-175.

Barchiesi, A. 1997: «Otto punti su una mappa dei naufragi», MD 39, pp. 209-226.

Blänsdorf, J. 1990: «Die Werwolf-Geschichte des Niceros bei Petron als Beispiel literarischer Fiktion mündlichen Erzählens», en Vogt-Spira, G. (ed.), Strukturen der Mündlichkeit in der römischen Literatur, Tubinga, pp. 193-217.

Callebat, L. 1998: Langages du roman latin, Hildesheim.

Ciaffi, V. 1955: Struttura del Satyricon, Turín.

Collignon, A. 1892: Étude sur Pétrone. La critique littéraire, l’imitation et la parodie dans le Satyricon, Paris.

Connors, C. 1998: Petronius the Poet, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511585272

Conte, G. B. 1974: Memoria dei poeti e sistema letterario, Turín.

Conte, G. B. 2007: L’autore nascosto. Un’interpretazione del Satyricon, Pisa.

Courtney, E. 2001: A Companion to Petronius, Oxford.

Cugusi, P. 2001: «Modelli epici ‘rovesciati’ in Petronio. Osservazioni sul riuso di Odissea e Eneide nei Satyrica», Aufidus 44, pp. 123-135.

Danese, R. 1989: «Il ritorno dell’eroe in patria: quasi una postilla (Petronio, Satyricon 114-115)», StudUrb (B) 62, pp. 213-220.

Delz, J. 1962: Reseña de Müller, K. 19611, Petronii Arbitri Satyricon, Gnomon 34, pp. 676-684.

Ernout, A. 19584: Pétrone: Le Satyricon, París.

Fedeli, P. 1981: «Petronio: il viaggio, il labirinto», MD 6, pp. 91-117.

Fedeli, P. 1988: «Encolpio-Polieno», MD 20-21, pp. 9-32.

Ferri, R. 1988: «Il Ciclope di Eumolpo e il Ciclope di Petronio: Sat. 100ss.», MD 20-1, pp. 311-315.

Galinsky, K. 1975: Ovid’s Metamorphoses. An Introduction to the Basic Aspects, Berkeley.

Galli, L. 1995: «Meeting again. Some Observations about Petronius Satyricon 100 and the Greek Novels», en Hofmann, H., Zimmerman, M. (eds.), Groningen Colloquia on the Novel, vol. 7, Groninga, pp. 33-45.

Hinds, S. 1998: Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry, Cambridge.

Jones, D. 1970: Reseña de Pianezzola, E. 1965, Gli aggettivi verbali in -bundus, CR 20, pp. 213-214.

Jones, F. 1987: «The Narrator and the Narrative of the Satyrica», Latomus 46, pp. 810-819.

Klebs, E. 1889: «Zur Komposition von Petronius Satirae», Philologus 47, pp. 623-655.

Kragelund, P. 1989: «Epicurus, Priapus and the Dreams in Petronius», CQ 39, pp. 436-450.

Labate, M. 1990: «Note Petroniane», MD 25, pp. 181-191.

Mazzilli, C. 2000: «Petronio 101, 7-103, 2: lusus allusivo e caratterizzazione dei personaggi», Aufidus 41, pp. 49-72.

Mazzilli, C. 2003: «Petronio 98.7-100.2. Stratigrafia intertestuale e risemantizzazione del modello», Aufidus 50-51, pp. 33-65.

McDermott, M. 1983: «The Satyricon as a Parody of the Odyssey and Greek Romance», LCM 8, pp. 82-85.

Müller, K. (19611), Petronii Arbitri Satyricon, Múnich.

Otis, B. 1970: Ovid as an Epic Poet, Cambridge.

Panayotakis, C. 1995: Theatrum Arbitri: Theatrical Elements in the Satyrica of Petronius, Leiden.

Papaioannou, S. 2005: Epic Succession and Dissension. Ovid, Metamorphoses 13.623-14.582 and the Reinvention of the Aeneid, Berlín.

Pianezzola, E. 1965: Gli aggettivi verbali in –bundus, Florencia.

Rimell, V. 2002: Petronius and the Anatomy of Fiction, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482359

Salanitro, M. 1998: «Il racconto del lupo mannaro in Petronio: tra folclore e letteratura», A&R 43, pp. 156-167.

Slater, N. 1990: Reading Petronius, Baltimore.

Sullivan, J. P. 1968: The Satyricon of Petronius. A Literary Study, Londres.

Vannini, G. 2005: «Note a Petronio (Sat. 100, 4; 115, 12; 115, 19)», MD 54, pp. 213-219.

Walsh, P. G. 1970: The Roman Novel. The Satyricon of Petronius and the Metamorphoses of Apuleius, Cambridge.

Downloads

Published

2012-12-30

How to Cite

Carmignani, M. (2012). Ille quidem totam gemebundus obambulat Aetnen: Parodic allusions to Ovidian Cyclops in Petronius, Sat. 100.3-5. Emerita, 80(2), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2012.18.1118

Issue

Section

Articles