Notas críticas a Eurípides, Medea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.1993.v61.i2.444Abstract
Although the knowledge of the manuscript tradition of the Medea by Euripides has been undeniably improved and there are new editions of this play, those of Diggle and van Looy, the text is still being corrected too much with unnecessary conjectures and seclusions which must be rejected. In some occasions Murray’s text (1902) is preferable. In this paper the author justifies the maintenance of the text of the manuscripts of Medea in several passages and he argues that the acceptance of some conjectures and some seclusions of verses are due to an inadequate knowledge of the poet’s intention or of the Greek syntax. Some neutral and rare uses as well as the lexical, syntactic and metrical hapax, which appear in the manuscripts, can be often defended.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
1993-12-30
How to Cite
Adrados, F. R. (1993). Notas críticas a Eurípides, Medea. Emerita, 61(2), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.1993.v61.i2.444
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 1993 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
