Crítica textual y estilo: nota a Farsalia I 254
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.1981.v49.i2.794Abstract
Almost every Lucan's manuscript has in Pharsalia I 254 the variant furentem (only one gives ruentem), but almost every one of the editors prefers ruentem. The acceptance of ruentem is due to the nearby presence of a furentum and a furoris. Here we maintain furentem as the right reading, on grounds of Lucan's familiar stylistic procedure of repetition of the key terms of a passage. The poetic value of this repetition is endorsed in modern times by R. Jakobson and S. R. Levin.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
1981-12-30
How to Cite
Holgado Redondo, A. (1981). Crítica textual y estilo: nota a Farsalia I 254. Emerita, 49(2), 353–359. https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.1981.v49.i2.794
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 1981 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
