The semantics of the preposition ὑπέρ in Homeric Greek

Authors

  • Chiara Zanchi Università di Pavia/ Università di Bergamo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2016.01.1418

Keywords:

meaning of prepositions, Homeric Greek, cognitive grammar, structured polysemy, case variation, semantic network

Abstract


Prepositions are highly polysemic words. In Homeric Greek, they either retain a number of meanings that are lost in post-Homeric Greek, or have not yet developed other meanings that later become conventionalized. In this paper, I analyze the semantics of the preposition ὑπέρ in Homeric Greek using the terminology of cognitive grammar. In addition, I use the model of structured polysemy in order to detect the original meaning of ὑπέρ, and to distinguish, among all its meanings, those triggered by the context from those independently stored in the mind of speakers. While making such a distinction, I also take into account both the semantic development of ὑπέρ in post-Homeric Greek, and the interaction between preposition and morphological case. I then arrange the distinct meanings in a semantic network, and link them directly or indirectly to the original spatial meaning. At the end, I show how further spatial or abstract meanings develop from the original meaning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, T. W. 1931: Homeri Ilias. Tomus II. Libros I-XII continens, Oxford.

Allen, T. W. 1931: Homeri Ilias. Tomus III. Libros XIII-XXIV continens, Oxford.

Brugman, C. 1981: The story of over. MA thesis, Dept. of Linguistics, UC Berkeley. Pubblicata (1988) come The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics, and the Structure of the Lexicon, New York.

Buck, C. D. 1910: Introduction to the study of the Greek dialects: grammar, selected inscriptions, glossary, Boston. PMCid:PMC2330625

Chantraine, P. 1953: Grammaire Homérique. Vol. II: Syntaxe, Parigi.

Chantraine, P. 1968: Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque, Parigi.

Ebeling, H. 1885: Lexicon Homericum. Vol. II: ?-Ω, Lipsia.

Hewson, J. e Bubenik, V. 2006: From Case to Adposition: The development of configurational syntax in Indo-European Languages, Amsterdam-Philadelphia.

Horrocks, G. C. 1981: Space and Time in Homer. Prepositional and Adverbial Particles in the Greek Epics, New York.

Kreitzer, A. 1997: «Multiple levels of schematization: a study in the conceptualiza tion of space», Cognitive Linguistics 8(4), pp. 291-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.291

Kury?owicz, J. 1964: The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European , Heidelberg.

Lakoff, G. 1987: Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , Chicago.

Langacker, R. W. 1987: Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. I, Stanford (CA).

Langacker, R. W. 2008: Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001

Lord, A. B. 1960: The singer of tales, Cambridge (MA).

Luraghi, S. 2003: On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases. A Study of the Expression of Semantic Roles in Ancient Greek , Amsterdam-Philadelphia.

Luraghi, S. 2010: «Where do beneficiaries come from and how do they come about? Sources for beneficiary expressions in Classical Greek and typology of beneficiary», in Tissari, H. et al. (eds.), Historical Cognitive Linguistics, Berlino-New York, pp. 93-131.

Luraghi, S. 2012: «The spatial meaning of diá with the accusative in Homeric Greek», Mnemosyne 65/3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852511X547965

Parry, A. (ed.) 1971: The Making of Homeric Verse. The Collected Papers of Milman Parry, Oxford.

Sandra, D. 1998: «What linguists can and can't tell us about the mind: a reply to Croft», Cognitive linguistics 9 (4), pp. 361-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.4.361

Schwyzer, E. 1950: Griechische Grammatik . Vol. II: Syntax, Monaco.

Talmy, L. 1988: «The relation of grammar to cognition», in Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, pp. 165-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/cilt.50.08tal

Taylor, J. R. 1993: «Prepositions: patterns of polysemisation and strategies of disambiguation», in Zelinsky-Wibbelt, C. (ed.), The semantics of prepositions, Berlino- New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110872576.151

Tyler, A. e Evans, V. 2003: The Semantics of English prepositions. Spatial scenes, Embodied Meaning and Cognition, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486517

Watkins, C. 1964: «Preliminaries to the reconstruction of Indo-European sentence structure», in Lunt, H. G. (ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists, L'Aia, pp. 1035-1045.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-30

How to Cite

Zanchi, C. (2016). The semantics of the preposition ὑπέρ in Homeric Greek. Emerita, 84(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2016.01.1418

Issue

Section

Articles