Verbal Politeness in Sophocles: Analysis of the Potential Optative in Directive Speech Acts

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2020.11.1942

Keywords:

Sophocles, potential optative, verbal politeness, Pragmatics, Syntax

Abstract


This paper, focused on the complete tragedies of Sophocles, analyses the use of potential optative in directive speech acts. Grammars analyse the potential optative in this type of speech acts as a politeness strategy. They do not determine, however, if it displays an identical functioning in all contexts. The analysis of the selected material allows to conclude that the use of the optative in the second person generally reflects a politeness strategy different from the strategy displayed both in the first and third person. In fact, in the second person the optative functions in most cases as a conventional expression of politeness. On the contrary, in the first and the third person the optative should be analysed as an off-record politeness expression that reduces the implication of the addressee in the fulfillment of the propositional content of the speech act.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allan, R. 2017: «The History of the Future: Grammaticalization and Subjectification in Ancient Greek Future Expressions», en Lambert, F., Allan, R. y Markopoulos, Th. (eds.), The Greek Future and its History, Lovaina, pp. 43-72.

Briz, A. 2007: «Para un análisis semántico, pragmático y sociopragmático de la cortesía atenuadora en España y América», LEA 29 (1), pp. 5-40.

Briz, A. y Albelda, M. 2013: «Una propuesta teórica y metodológica para el análisis de la atenuación lingüística en español y portugués. La base de un proyecto en común (ES.POR.ATENUACIÓN)», Onomazein 28, pp. 288-319. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.28.21

Brown, P. y Levinson, S. C. 1987: Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085

Caffi, C. 2007: «Mitigation», Studies in Pragmatics 4, Oxford.

Catrambone, M. 2016: «Off-Record Politeness in Sophocles», Journal of Politeness Research 12 (2), pp. 173-195. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0009

Chantraine, P. 19972: Grammaire homérique II: Syntaxe, París.

Clark, H. y Brenann, S. 1991: «Grounding in Communication», en Resnick, B. Levine, J. M. y Teasley, S. D. (eds.), Perspective on Socially Shared Cognition, Washington, pp. 127-149.

Clark, H. y Carlson, Th. 1982: «Hearers and Speech Acts», Language 58, pp. 332-373. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1982.0042

Conti, L. 2017: «On the Non-Prototypical Uses of Adverbs in Homer: Analysis of ἤδη», en Pocchetti, P. y Logozzo, F. (eds.), Ancient Greek Linguistics: New Approaches, Insights, Perspectives, Berlín-Boston, pp. 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110551754-131

Crespo, E., Conti, L. y Maquieira, H. 2003: Sintaxis del griego clásico, Madrid.

Culpeper, J. 1996: «Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness», Journal of Pragmatics 25, pp. 249-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3

Culpeper, J. y Qian, K. 2019: «Communicative Styles, Rapport, and Student Engagement: An Online Peer Mentoring Scheme», Applied Linguistics 2019: 0/0, pp. 1-32.

Denizot, C. 2011: Donner des ordres en grec ancien. Étude linguistique des formes de l'injonction, París.

Drummen, A. 2013: «A Constructionist Approach to the Potential Optative in Classical Greek Drama», Glotta 89, pp. 6-108. https://doi.org/10.13109/glot.2013.89.14.68

Filimonova, E. 2005: «The Noun Phrase Hierarchy and Relational Marking: Problems and Counterevidence», Linguistic Typology 9, pp. 77-113. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2005.9.1.77

Haverkate, H. 1979: Impositive Sentences in Spanish, Ámsterdam.

Haverkate, H. 1984: Speech Acts, Speakers and Hearers, Ámsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.v.4

Hoffmann, M. E. 1987: Negatio Contrarii: A Study of Latin Litotes, Assen.

Itagaki, N. y Prideaux, D. (1985): «Nominal Properties as Determinants of Subject Selection», Lingua 66, pp. 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(85)90292-X

Kadar, D. Z. 2019: «Introduction: Advancing Linguistic Politeness Theory by Using Chinese Data», Acta Linguistica Academica 66 (2), pp. 149-164. https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2019.66.2.1

Keenan, E. y Comrie, B. 1977: «Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar», Linguistic Inquiry 8, pp. 63-99.

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. 1996: La conversation, París.

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. 2004: «Il fait vraiment chaud aujourd'hui! Vous voulez boire quelque chose? Le 'travail des faces' dans l'échange initié par une offre», en Auchlin, A. et al. (eds.), Structures et discours. Mélanges offerts à Eddy Roulet, Quebec, pp. 417-432.

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. 2005: Le discours en interaction, París.

Kienpointner, M. 1997: «Varieties of Rudeness: Types and Functions of Impolite Utterances», Functions of Language 4, pp. 251-287. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.4.2.05kie

Kühner, R. y Gerth, B. 1898: Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache, II: Syntax, Hannover-Leipzig.

Lloyd, M. 2006: «Sophocles in the Light of Face-Threat Politeness Theory», en Rijksbaron, A. y de Jong, I. (eds.), Sophocles and the Greek language: Aspects of Diction, Syntax and Pragmatics, Leiden-Boston, pp. 225-239. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047417422_016

Lloyd, M. 2012: «Sophocles the Ironist», en Markantonatos, A. (ed.), Brill's Companion to Sophocles, Leiden, pp. 563-577. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004217621_030

Locher, M. A. 2004: Power and Politeness in Action, Disagreements in Oral Communication, Berlín-Nueva York.. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110926552

Locher, M. A. y Watts, R. 2005: «Politeness Theory and Relational Work», Journal of Politeness Research 1, pp. 9-33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9

Moorhouse, A. C. 1982: The Syntax of Sophocles, Leiden. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004327962 PMCid:PMC1555536

Risselada, R. 1993: Imperatives and Other Directive Expressions in Latin, Ámsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004408975

Searle, J. 1975: «Indirect Speech Acts», en Cole, P. y Morgan, J. L. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech acts, pp. 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_004

Searle, J. 1989: «How Performatives Work», Linguistics and Philosophy 12, pp. 535-558. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627773

Slings, S. R. 1992: «Written and Spoken Language: An Exercise in the Pragmatics of the Greek Language», Classical Philology 87, pp. 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1086/367293

Spencer-Oatey, H. 2008: «Face, (Im)politeness and Rapport», en Spencer-Oatey, H. (ed.), Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory, Nueva York, pp. 11-47.

Van Emde Boas, E., Rijksbaron, A., Huitik, L. y de Bakker, M. 2019: Cambridge Grammar of Classical Greek, Cambridge.

Villalba, C. 2013: «La impersonalidad como recurso atenuante en los juicios orales», en Cabedo, A., Aguilar, M. J. y López-Navarro, E. (eds.), Estudios de lingüística: investigaciones, propuestas y aplicaciones, Valencia, pp. 121-135.

Watts, Richard J. 2003: Politeness, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184

Yamamoto, M. 2006: Agency and Impersonality: Their Linguistic and Cultural Manifestations, Ámsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.78

Downloads

Published

2020-12-17

How to Cite

Conti, L. . (2020). Verbal Politeness in Sophocles: Analysis of the Potential Optative in Directive Speech Acts. Emerita, 88(2), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2020.11.1942

Issue

Section

Articles